“At the same time that we allow our children to be sexualized, we refuse to educate them about sex.”
Jean Kilbourne is smart, articulate, and persuasive. What a great example of feminist apparency!
“At the same time that we allow our children to be sexualized, we refuse to educate them about sex.”
Jean Kilbourne is smart, articulate, and persuasive. What a great example of feminist apparency!
Comments Off on Killing Us Softly 4
Posted in All blog entries
Tagged digital rhetorics, feminisms, technology, visible rhetoric, women
I recently taught a course on Women, Gender and Society. As part of my prep for that class, I did some research on the ways mass media images are digitally altered. I found great resources, including some excellent videos like this one:
And I also found, you know, other stuff. Like the pop-up ad on the bottom of this video (this is a screenshot image). We have a ways to go.
Posted in All blog entries
Tagged bodies, digital rhetorics, feminisms, sexuality, visible rhetoric, women
When Disney came out with the movie Brave, I loved it. That’s probably not surprising. I identify with the heroine, Merida, on the levels of appearance and heritage, for one thing. But, more importantly, writer Brenda Chapman is from my home county of just 30,000 people. And, even better, this is one of only a few “fairy tales” I’ve ever witnessed where the heroine’s ultimate happy ending does NOT come in the form of a guy.
And then THIS happened.
This image showing the sexualization of Merida is borrowed from Monika Bartyzel’s story in The Week, which is linked below.
I liked her so much better when she was spunky, independent, and NOT oozing sex appeal.
Comments Off on Re-branding Merida
Posted in All blog entries
Tagged bodies, feminisms, gender, identity, race, sexuality, visible rhetoric, women
Just some food for thought for today.
Comments Off on Paying (critical) attention to advertising
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged bodies, feminisms, gender, sexuality, visible rhetoric, women
The following is pulled directly from a breaking New York Times story. Notice that ultrasound–a medical digital imaging process that pro-lifers often try to frame as objective–features prominently in the lede.
“Arkansas adopted what is by far the country’s most restrictive ban on abortion on Wednesday — at 12 weeks of pregnancy, when a fetal heartbeat can typically be detected by abdominal ultrasound.
The law, the sharpest challenge yet to Roe v. Wade, was passed by the newly Republican-controlled legislature over the veto of Gov. Mike Beebe, a Democrat, who called it “blatantly unconstitutional.” The State Senate voted Tuesday to override his veto and the House followed suit on Wednesday, with several Democrats joining the Republican majority.
The law contradicts the limit established by Supreme Court decisions, which give women a right to an abortion until the fetus is viable outside the womb, usually around 24 weeks into pregnancy, and abortion rights groups promised a quick lawsuit to block it.”
Comments Off on Arkansas abortion law
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged medical rhetoric, visible rhetoric, women
You must be logged in to post a comment.